Logon
Translate

User login

GTranslate

French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish

The Home of Evolutioneers

Universe Spirit Blogs

  • Evidence Of Impending Tipping Point For Earth

    ScienceDaily June 6, 2012

    A group of scientists from around the world is warning that population growth, widespread destruction of natural ecosystems, and climate change may be driving Earth toward an irreversible change in the biosphere, a planet-wide tipping point that would have destructive consequences absent adequate preparation and mitigation.

    "It really will be a new world, biologically, at that point," warns Anthony Barnosky, professor of integrative biology at the University of California, Berkeley, and lead author of a review paper appearing in the June 7 issue of the journal Nature. "The data suggests that there will be a reduction in biodiversity and severe impacts on much of what we depend on to sustain our quality of life, including, for example, fisheries, agriculture, forest products and clean water. This could happen within just a few generations."

    The Nature paper, in which the scientists compare the biological impact of past incidents of global change with processes under way today and assess evidence for what the future holds, appears in an issue devoted to the environment in advance of the June 20-22 United Nations Rio+20 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    The result of such a major shift in the biosphere would be mixed, Barnosky noted, with some plant and animal species disappearing, new mixes of remaining species, and major disruptions in terms of which agricultural crops can grow where.

    The paper by 22 internationally known scientists describes an urgent need for better predictive models that are based on a detailed understanding of how the biosphere reacted in the distant past to rapidly changing conditions, including climate and human population growth. In a related development, ground-breaking research to develop the reliable, detailed biological forecasts the paper is calling for is now underway at UC Berkeley. The endeavor, The Berkeley Initiative in Global Change Biology, or BiGCB, is a massive undertaking involving more than 100 UC Berkeley scientists from an extraordinary range of disciplines that already has received funding: a $2.5 million grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and a $1.5 million grant from the Keck Foundation. The paper by Barnosky and others emerged from the first conference convened under the BiGCB's auspices.

    "One key goal of the BiGCB is to understand how plants and animals responded to major shifts in the atmosphere, oceans, and climate in the past, so that scientists can improve their forecasts and policy makers can take the steps necessary to either mitigate or adapt to changes that may be inevitable," Barnosky said. "Better predictive models will lead to better decisions in terms of protecting the natural resources future generations will rely on for quality of life and prosperity." Climate change could also lead to global political instability, according to a U.S. Department of Defense study referred to in the Nature paper.

    "UC Berkeley is uniquely positioned to conduct this sort of complex, multi-disciplinary research," said Graham Fleming, UC Berkeley's vice chancellor for research. "Our world-class museums hold a treasure trove of biological specimens dating back many millennia that tell the story of how our planet has reacted to climate change in the past. That, combined with new technologies and data mining methods used by our distinguished faculty in a broad array of disciplines, will help us decipher the clues to the puzzle of how the biosphere will change as the result of the continued expansion of human activity on our planet."

    One BiGCB project launched last month, with UC Berkeley scientists drilling into Northern California's Clear Lake, one of the oldest lakes in the world with sediments dating back more than 120,000 years, to determine how past changes in California's climate impacted local plant and animal populations.

    City of Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates, chair of the Bay Area Joint Policy Committee, said the BiGCB "is providing the type of research that policy makers urgently need as we work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and prepare the Bay region to adapt to the inevitable impacts of climate change. To take meaningful actions to protect our region, we first need to understand the serious global and local changes that threaten our natural resources and biodiversity."

    "The Bay Area's natural systems, which we often take for granted, are absolutely critical to the health and well-being of our people, our economy and the Bay Area's quality of life," added Bates.

    How close is a global tipping point?

    The authors of the Nature review -- biologists, ecologists, complex-systems theoreticians, geologists and paleontologists from the United States, Canada, South America and Europe -- argue that, although many warning signs are emerging, no one knows how close Earth is to a global tipping point, or if it is inevitable. The scientists urge focused research to identify early warning signs of a global transition and an acceleration of efforts to address the root causes.

    "We really do have to be thinking about these global scale tipping points, because even the parts of Earth we are not messing with directly could be prone to some very major changes," Barnosky said. "And the root cause, ultimately, is human population growth and how many resources each one of us uses."

    Coauthor Elizabeth Hadly from Stanford University said "we may already be past these tipping points in particular regions of the world. I just returned from a trip to the high Himalayas in Nepal, where I witnessed families fighting each other with machetes for wood -- wood that they would burn to cook their food in one evening. In places where governments are lacking basic infrastructure, people fend for themselves, and biodiversity suffers. We desperately need global leadership for planet Earth."

    The authors note that studies of small-scale ecosystems show that once 50-90 percent of an area has been altered, the entire ecosystem tips irreversibly into a state far different from the original, in terms of the mix of plant and animal species and their interactions. This situation typically is accompanied by species extinctions and a loss of biodiversity.

    Currently, to support a population of 7 billion people, about 43 percent of Earth's land surface has been converted to agricultural or urban use, with roads cutting through much of the remainder. The population is expected to rise to 9 billion by 2045; at that rate, current trends suggest that half Earth's land surface will be disturbed by 2025. To Barnosky, this is disturbingly close to a global tipping point.

    "Can it really happen? Looking into the past tells us unequivocally that, yes, it can really happen. It has happened. The last glacial/interglacial transition 11,700 years ago was an example of that," he said, noting that animal diversity still has not recovered from extinctions during that time. "I think that if we want to avoid the most unpleasant surprises, we want to stay away from that 50 percent mark."

    Global change biology

    The paper emerged from a conference held at UC Berkeley in 2010 to discuss the idea of a global tipping point, and how to recognize and avoid it.

    Following that meeting, 22 of the attendees summarized available evidence of past global state-shifts, the current state of threats to the global environment, and what happened after past tipping points.

    They concluded that there is an urgent need for global cooperation to reduce world population growth and per-capita resource use, replace fossil fuels with sustainable sources, develop more efficient food production and distribution without taking over more land, and better manage the land and ocean areas not already dominated by humans as reservoirs of biodiversity and ecosystem services.

    "Ideally, we want to be able to predict what could be detrimental biological change in time to steer the boat to where we don't get to those points," Barnosky said. "My underlying philosophy is that we want to keep Earth, our life support system, at least as healthy as it is today, in terms of supporting humanity, and forecast when we are going in directions that would reduce our quality of life so that we can avoid that."

    "My view is that humanity is at a crossroads now, where we have to make an active choice," Barnosky said. "One choice is to acknowledge these issues and potential consequences and try to guide the future (in a way we want to). The other choice is just to throw up our hands and say, 'Let's just go on as usual and see what happens.' My guess is, if we take that latter choice, yes, humanity is going to survive, but we are going to see some effects that will seriously degrade the quality of life for our children and grandchildren."

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0606132308.htm

    Click this Join/Subscribe link or the one at the top of the page and we will keep you informed of Universe Spirit events and important updates. Also subscribe to this Universe blog separately by clicking here.

    If you would like to see a realistic comprehensive and systemic approach to global warming and climate destabilization, click here.

    Air Max 90 Hypfuse

  • Effective Steps to Prevent Going off the Climate Cliff of Human-Caused Irreversible or Extinction Level Climate Destabilization

    This list of essential climate re-stabilization steps to prevent humanity having to experience irreversible or extinction level climate destabilization (below,) is called the Job One for Humanity Action Plan because that is what we believe this program of steps has now become. Based on the best current science, systems thinking and dialectical analysis it contains the most effective steps that YOU can do to help prevent, prepare for, lessen and even reverse the escalating catastrophic climate destabilization (aka global warming, climate change,) that we are all now witnessing. Anyone from every walk of life or age group (even teens and the elderly,) can find something on this prioritized list that they can do to contribute to helping achieve climate re-stabilization.

    Click here to review and start these critical climate re-stabilization steps!

     

    Click this Join/Subscribe link or the one at the top of the page and we will keep you informed of Universe Spirit events and important updates. Also subscribe to this Universe blog separately by clicking here.

    If you would like to see a realistic comprehensive and systemic approach to global warming and climate destabilization, click here.

    nike air max 90 nz

  • Stanford Study: Climate Change Threatens Freshwater Source for Billions

    Stanford University November 11, 2012 by Rob Jordan

    Snowpack, an essential source of drinking water and agricultural irrigation for billions of people, could shrink significantly within the next 30 years, according to a study led by Stanford climate change researcher Noah Diffenbaugh.

    The study, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, forecasts the effect of climate change on Northern Hemisphere snowpack through the 21st century in the Western United States, Alpine Europe, Central Asia and downstream of the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau. The news is particularly troubling for snowpack-dependent California – the largest producer of agriculture products in the country and the sixth-largest agriculture exporter in the world.

    "The Western U.S. exhibits the strongest increases in the occurrence of extremely low snow years in response to global warming," Diffenbaugh said. "It also exhibits some of the strongest decreases in runoff that occurs during the growing season." Diffenbaugh is an assistant professor in Stanford's Department of Environmental Earth System Science and a center fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.

    Less snow accumulation, increased cold season runoff and decreased warm season runoff could lead not only to overwhelmed reservoirs and flooding in winter, but also to insufficient water for agriculture in spring and summer when demand is highest. Hydroelectric production, water-dependent ecosystems and snow-dependent recreation industries could also suffer. On top of that, early spring snowmelt has been associated with an increase in wildfires, insect pests and species extinctions in the Western United States and elsewhere.

    By filling reservoirs and watering crops when warmer, drier weather sets in, mountain snowpack has become vital to people and ecosystems in regions such as the Western United States, Alpine Europe, Central Asia and downstream of the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau – home to more than 50 percent of the world's population.

    "If we look at the systems that humans currently have in place for managing water resources, we see that much of the Northern Hemisphere is dependent on snowpack for water storage," Diffenbaugh said. "Our results suggest that global warming will put increasing pressure on both flood control in the cold season and water availability in the dry season, and that these changes are likely to occur in some of the most densely populated and water-stressed areas of the planet."

    The connection between rising global temperatures and disappearing snowpack has long been evident. Diffenbaugh and his fellow researchers took a new look at the issue by examining predicted extremes in snowpack accumulation and runoff. Using advanced climate modeling techniques, they compared a century's worth of predicted future data for precipitation, accumulation and runoff with the average and extreme rates for the same phenomena during the 30 years between 1976 and 2005.

    The researchers found that the occurrence of low snow years will likely intensify throughout most snow-dominated areas of the Northern Hemisphere during this century, becoming the norm more than 80 percent of the time over most of North America, western Eurasia and southeastern Eurasia by 2070.

    The areas of North America and Eurasia predicted to have the highest number of low-snow years are also predicted to have extremely low snow accumulation.

    "Our analysis highlights the potential impacts of climate change if greenhouse gas emissions continue on their current trajectory," Diffenbaugh said. "While the greatest impacts are likely to occur at higher levels of global warming, our results highlight the fact that continued emissions over the next few decades are likely to substantially reduce snow accumulation in a number of regions, increasing the risk of both flooding and drought in different parts of the year."

    The study's co-authors include Moetasim Ashfaq, a research scientist at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Martin Scherer, a research assistant in Stanford's Department of Environmental Earth System Science. The study was made possible by grants from the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Department of Energy.

    Rob Jordan is the communications writer for the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.

    Media Contact:

    Noah Diffenbaugh, Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment: cell (650) 223-9425, office (650) 725-7510, diffenbaugh@stanford.edu

    Christine Harrison, Communications, Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment: (650) 725-8240, christine.harrision@stanford.edu

    Nancy Peterson, Communications, School of Earth Sciences: (650) 776-2276, npete@stanford.edu

    Dan Stober, Stanford News Service: (650) 721-6965, dstober@stanford.edu

    http://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/november/future-snowpack-decline-111112.html

     

    Click this Join/Subscribe link or the one at the top of the page and we will keep you informed of Universe Spirit events and important updates. Also subscribe to this Universe blog separately by clicking here.

    If you would like to see a realistic comprehensive and systemic approach to global warming and climate destabilization, click here.

    jordan shoes for sale outlet fashion

  • The Current State of Escalating Global Climate Destabilization: A Not So Happy Unclassified Discussion and Summary

    Submitted by Lawrence on Fri, 11/23/2012 - 13:17

    "The worst case projections for global warming may be the most likely, according to an analysis from scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)."

    There is no way to deny it. We are not winning the global warming climate destabilization battle! Cataclysmic climate destabilization is already here and escalating --- and the remaining climate battle now is to try to avert an irreversible or an extinction-level of global climate destabilization.

    We are so close to going over the tipping points of the next climate cliff that some researchers feel we have already done so. Extinction level here is defined as the projected potential extinction of approximately half or more of the species on earth and most (60-90%), if not all, of humanity. Irreversible, whenever used, is defined as severe climate destabilization consequences that could take hundreds or even thousands of years to correct or re-balance--if at all.

    In spite of 30 years of warnings and education by scientists, the environmental movement and media exposure to an ever-increasing body of compelling scientific evidence (now agreed to by 84% of the scientists qualified in climate science) carbon pollution of the atmosphere has not slowed or leveled off. It has increased! To make things worse, it has not increased in a gradual manner.

    Leading climate scientists like James Hansen say that we would remain safe if carbon in the atmosphere did not go over 350 parts per million (ppm). As of August 2012, carbon ppm was at near 400 ppm (430 ppm including methane) and was increasing at about 2-3 ppm plus per year in a non-linear, accelerating exponential progression (imagine a rapidly rising carbon ppm graph curve).

    If we include methane, we will be at carbon 450 ppm in 10 years or less.

    To put this in perspective, from 1850 to about 1950, carbon pollution was steady at about a 1 ppm per year increase. From 1950 to 2000, it rose to 2 ppm per year and now it is exponentially rising rapidly towards 3 ppm per year. If carbon continues to rise exponentially and virtually unchecked as it appears it will, some post 2025 predictions project carbon increasing to a possible additional 4-6 ppm per year.

    Based on carbon ppm levels already in the system and reaching the 450 mark, this means that a two degree Celsius global temperature increase (4 degrees Fahrenheit) is already an inescapable reality. One factor seldom considered in the public's awareness of the climate destabilization challenges is the climate momentum factor--also relating to why we will reach the carbon 450 mark with certainty. (Price Cooper Waterhouse [an international accounting firm] did the disheartening temperature calculations in late 2012 and said it is virtually assured we will hit 2 degrees Celsius and that we would probably hit 6 degrees Celsius.)

    Here is how it works. Greenhouse heat that is also trapped in the oceans and elsewhere besides the atmosphere from past carbon pollution has an estimated 40-80 year period of dissipation. This means that our climate warming has a 40-80 year momentum behind it. In other words, if we found a way to stop 100% of all current carbon pollution today, our climate's temperature would have to wait for the heat dissipation momentum of the last 40-80 years before the climate temperature would fully stabilize. This also means that at whatever point in time we do radically reduce carbon pollution of the atmosphere, we will then have this same climate momentum monster to deal with. Unfortunately, it will be worse because of the additional carbon we have added to the atmosphere in the time from now to that later point.

    It is also highly probable that because of our denial as well as the physical time lags in developing and the widespread deployment of new green energy technology, (25-35 years) to correct or diminish it (once we do pass enforceable international laws making large scale carbon pollution of the atmosphere), that carbon will also rise rapidly to carbon 550 ppm, which translates to a 3-4 degree Celsius increase (6-8 degrees Fahrenheit) in global temperature.

    Making this recipe for mega-disaster even worse, new research indicates that for every degree of Celsius temperature increase, global food production will drop 10% while the human population continues to soar toward 8 billion. Climate scientists who are normally guarded in their language call a 4 degree Celsius increase (6-8 degrees Fahrenheit) "hell on Earth."

    If climate destabilization proceeds to the levels currently being predicted, over time it will eventually cost the global society many hundreds of trillions of dollars in crisis recovery as well as soaring insurance rates, massive real estate depreciation, and massive infrastructure losses --- not even taking into account the vast amount of human suffering and death. The Stern Review estimated that the costs of catastrophic climate destabilization will grow to consume as much as 5% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of every nation on earth --- and that is not even at climate destabilization's (CCD's) worse latter stages!

    Right now, most of the nations on earth are struggling with over indebtedness and their economies are in trouble with anemic annual growth. How will they ever remain financially viable, stable, or even in existence if another 5% or more of their total GDP is drained off each year into the continually escalating costs of climate destabilization?

    Catastrophic climate destabilization is already here and its storms, flooding, wildfires, heat waves, migrating insect infestations, and droughts will continue increasing in scale, severity, and frequency. The real battle now lies in how to keep from going off the climate cliff and staving off climate destabilization from becoming irreversible or a humanity extinction level event as the global temperature increases to 5-6 degrees Celsius (8-12 degrees Fahrenheit) and beyond...

    Current efforts at establishing enforceable international laws for reversing climate destabilization have resulted in dismal failure. After many years and over a dozen major meetings, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is largely impotent and shows little hope as it is currently progressing to ever be able to deal with the critical path climate destabilization time lines and tipping points.

    Cap and Trade laws, which are not the right laws we need anyway, (fee and dividend are the correct new laws) have only been passed in one U.S. state (California) and, according to leading experts like James Hansen, these fossil fuel industry lobbyist watered down ineffective Cap and Trade laws will not save us from catastrophic and irreversible climate destabilization in time.

    "There should be no denial surrounding the facts about the escalating climate destabilization caused by global warming due to the burning of fossil fuels. Unfortunately, even in the climate re-stabilization community there is still denial of just how bad it is.” --Lawrence Wollersheim

    The Perfect Storm of the Unknown Climate Tipping Points

    The two most dangerous facts about the climate:

    1.) Current climate science on many of the critical climate tipping points is grossly incomplete and underfunded.

    2.) Climate systems are complex adaptive systems and complex adaptive systems have tipping points. Those tipping points can cause sudden, unpredictable and severe changes, and collapses. In complex adaptive systems, tipping points and small changes in the master climate system or in its subsystems can unpredictably whipsaw into each other and produce unexpected massive changes.  (If you do not understand the basics of complex adaptive systems and their unpredictability, we strongly recommend that you click this complex adaptive systems link because understanding the climate as a complex system and its tipping point paradoxes will be greatly aided and simplified.)

    This complex adaptive system unpredictableness factor is critical. As climate research stands now, no one can currently say with any degree of accuracy when our atmospheric carbon and methane pollution “experiment” will cross the final tipping points of irreversible or extinction-level climate destabilization. No one can tell us what exact carbon and methane pollution level or climate system temperature tipping point or other action will do it --- or, even worse, if we have already unknowingly gone off the climate cliff and crossed the final climate tipping point of irreversibility.

    (To get up to speed on the specific tipping points of the climate and its subsystems, watch a 10 minute video that graphically explains many tipping points by clicking here and go to the section half way down the page.)

    Unbelievably, with its many still unknown climate tipping points, this makes human-caused carbon pollution of the atmosphere the single most dangerous and destructive blind experiment and looming disaster in all of human history.

    As an example of the un-researched or incomplete tipping point research dilemma, take the example of our current best science computer models for when the Northwest Passage above Canada and Russia will be ice free during the summers. In 2007, they predicted this would not happen until 2035 to 2050. Now, just a few years later based on the current escalating warming, they now predict that in 2015-2020 the Northwest Passage will be completely ice free during the summers.

    This means in just 7 years our best-science predictions had to be corrected by 30-35 years over a 43 year total prediction period. This means the best time predictions of 2007 were 60-70 percent off.

    What is really scary about this is what if the other time predictions of the 2007 IPPC report are also off by 60-70% because of lack of tipping point research?  What if the IPPC predictions for 2100 will actually happen in 2040 or 2050? What if the level of storms, flooding, wildfires, heat waves, migrating insect infestations and droughts of increasing exponential scale, severity and frequency that were predicted for 2060-2080 started arriving in 2020-2040?

    Can we really trust any temperature increase, sea level rise predictions, or  timetables until more climate system and sub-system research is done? And most importantly, what does this new absence of adequate climate tipping point research mean for our current strategies and timetables for managing catastrophic climate destabilization? Are we using near-useless timeframes? (Read about the major climate system and sub-system tipping points that are not adequately researched and often missing from many of our climate temperature and sea level rise prediction calculations by clicking here.)

    Now add to this new research by climate scientists that the Earth's climate is capable of major average temperature changes over large and small areas in much shorter time than ever imagined. First, they thought major average temperature changes took thousands of years, then centuries. Now, there is new research to show that in just decades, average temperature change can be significant. New research has shown that in the past the average temperature over the Greenland area increased 7 degrees Celsius (about 12-14 degrees Fahrenheit) in just 2-5 decades.

    All of the above tipping point data makes the incompletely researched climate tipping situation the perfect scenario for the Perfect Climate Storm. Not knowing or ignoring these climate tipping points issues and their potentially drastic and rapid consequences is a risk we REALLY do not want to take.

    (If you have not seen this 9 minute climate destabilization risk analysis video, do so now so that you fully understand why we must act now and collectively and how we can be smarter in managing the blind climate experiment that we are all unknowingly participating in. This video and its earlier version have had millions of views in spite of its sometimes comical presentation of such a serious issue.)

    The Perfect Storm of Perfect Storms

    As if the unknown tipping points of climate destabilization are not enough of a perfect storm, there is another larger “perfect storm of perfect storms” looming in the not too distant future. This perfect storm of perfect storms will occur because as the global climate destabilizes, so will the global economy. As the global economy destabilizes, so will  the political landscape of functioning nations. As the climate, the global economy, and the political landscape of functioning nations destabilize, so do all of the various societies (individuals, businesses, organizations, etc.).

    The first perfect storm of unknown climate tipping points not only whipsaws all of our current global challenges into each other, it makes them individually worse. Environmental collapse, a over burdened global economy, and failing nations all whipsawing off of each other with unexpected consequences will make our current global challenges far worse than they are now!

    We are already struggling with serious global economic problems. We already have many failed and minimally functional nations. In those existing failed nations, economic,  social struggle and breakdown are already common.  Now just imagine what will happen to exacerbate our global economic, political, and social problems once they have been further destabilized and then amplified by the escalating climate destabilization…

    What also makes this perfect storm of perfect storms worse is that we do not have a unified government with the power to enforce the many self-interested parties to work together collectively against irreversible or extinction level climate destabilization. Due to our evolutionary immaturity as a species, a unified global management with the needed verification and enforcement powers is not anywhere on the near horizon to come to our rescue.

    With escalating climate destabilization, we have entered into an age of destructive creation, retrogression, and global meta-crisis far beyond the management capabilities of our fractionalized and nationalized self-interests. How soon will this all begin?

    It already has!

    Unfortunately, our well-intentioned leaders either haven’t seen the pattern of a whole, interconnected complex adaptive system headed for a sudden and hard to predict collapse or, they refuse to see that this process has already begun. From now until we reach carbon 450 ppm somewhere around 2020 (which creates an eventual 4 degree temperature increase), during the decades of 2030 to 2050 we may be watching the “perfect storm of perfect storms” unfolding across our planet.

    Too many of our leaders and intelligence agencies in climate risk analysis that fails to meet minimal threshold for essential data are ignoring the unknown climate tipping point factors and the recent, horribly-failed summer Arctic ice coverage predictions hoping that either “climate destabilization really won’t get that bad until the second half of the 21st century or that we (the generations alive now) still have lots of time or can adapt to it.”

    We in this organization believe that because of the vast amount of missing tipping point research and our still incomplete understanding of the elements and subsystems of the climate as a complex adaptive system, one should adjust the time occurring and severity of consequences predictions of the 2007 IPPC report by 50-70% to the negative. This adjustment does not even consider how the IPPC report was most certainly politicized and watered down because of all of the nations and individuals who had to sign off on it before it could be released.

    While when it will come will most likely surprise us, how it will come is much better established. Global warming and climate destabilization will proceed irregularly. Some places will actually get colder as most of the planet warms. Weather will be more unpredictable as its worst effects increase in severity, scale, and frequency. As major and minor climate tipping points are crossed, there will be sudden and steep spurts and jerks of alternating and non alternating negative weather consequences. Floods, droughts, heat waves, wildfires, super storms, seasons that do not seem normal such as monsoons that are too short, winters that last too long or are too warm, or springs that come too early. If left unchecked, eventually the exponential growth of carbon and methane pollution in the atmosphere will cause our dynamic climate system equilibrium of glacial periods and non glacial periods that has oscillated predictably within a stable range for hundreds of thousands of years to destabilize and collapse.   

    Destructive Creation and the Possible Opportunity of Climate Destabilization

    After all of this bad news about the climate, is there a silver lining? They say "great catastrophe holds equally great opportunity."

    Many individuals who have survived great catastrophes have said  the catastrophe helped them see aspects of our world that both society and themselves had hid behind veils of denial. They also said the catastrophe gave them the opportunity to change and to take responsibility for what they had finally discovered. Historically, great catastrophe often precedes a period of great renewal, advancement, and growth. For example, the Black Death and the Dark Ages preceded the great advances of the Enlightenment Age of human history.

    If climate destabilization continues to escalate unchecked as it is now, climate destabilization will most certainly bring about its own kind of Black Death and Dark Ages period. We can only hope such a catastrophe will bring about a new, more enlightened, and sustainable global order. For more about the other 15 silver linings of climate destabilization, click here.

    And finally...

    As if all the above was not more than one can bear, the nongovernmental environmental movement, which originally broke this issue, has not in any well-coordinated way made irreversible or extinction-level climate destabilization the keystone environmental issue of our time. It is, after all, the single issue upon which almost all other environmental issues will be severely impacted. In spite of all of the worthy work that the environmental movement is doing in other non-climate areas, it cannot coordinate on this keystone issue of global warming and climate destabilization the Job One for all Humanity of our time.

    So now it is time to be honest with ourselves. The first battle against stopping the rise of climate destabilization has been resoundingly lost and we are now in a planetary state of emergency. It is time to start the second battle of the climate war, which is --- preparing for and lessening it --- in order to lessen the suffering and for as many people as possible to survive!

    The Likely Future: Prepare, Adapt, and Where Still Possible, Lessen and Slow.

    Human history has resoundingly demonstrated that people, businesses, and nations do not normally make the kind of major and costly changes needed until "the pain of going forward is less than the pain of where they are." In spite of political rhetoric to the contrary, this implies that until the climate destabilization crisis becomes far, far worse than hurricane Sandy was, (which will cost the U.S. in excess of 65 billion dollars) it is unlikely that much if any effective national or international climate stabilization actions will be taken. By that time, because of new tipping points being crossed, it could easily be too late to avert irreversible or extinction-level climate destabilization. Unless there is a miracle, it is not likely that the world's politicians will do anything substantive until we start having regular climate destabilization mega-disasters each costing somewhere in the range of 1/4 to 1/2 trillion dollars each.

    This likely ongoing failure to act collectively with enforceable international laws also implies that we need to prepare for and adapt to these worsening climate conditions now, while doing what we can to help mitigate the rapidly escalating climate destabilization already upon us and, finally, to do whatever we can to survive after that.

    "We need to understand that the stability of our global climate is the essential and conditioning "game board" upon which all life and all of life's games and goals are played. If this master conditioning game board of life is destabilized, it will destabilize all of our other sub-game boards (our current economic, social and political games). Not many people really get that almost everything that they are currently doing within their personal, business and political lives will become increasingly destabilized as their local climate destabilizes and their local support systems collapse as the global climate and master ’game board’ becomes more destabilized.

    We need to begin thinking about irreversible climate destabilization like a slow-moving, but still game-ending asteroid that is on a near irreversible extinction event level collision course with Earth. When you finally get this, you will begin to understand the seriousness of why we must prepare ourselves now and then act to immediately try to lessen the escalating cataclysmic climate destabilization that is already upon us." --Lawrence Wollersheim

    Still not quite convinced and need to see more hard facts and graphs on climate destabilization? Then click here for the two biggest shockers about climate destabilization and their research backup data.

    To learn what global warming caused climate destabilization is, click here.

    To learn why the term climate destabilization is replacing climate change and global warming, click here.

    To learn what you can do to reverse global warming and climate destabilization, click here.

    If you would like to know how climate destabilization aversely affects and fits in with humanity's other six greatest global challenges, click here.

    With climate destabilization, we are all now facing the greatest single adaptive challenge and transformational evolutionary adventure in all of human history. If you would like to learn more and learn what you can personally do to help resolve climate destabilization and the climate crisis affecting all of our mutual futures, click here for the brutally honest, effective, and comprehensive Job One for Humanity Climate Restabilization Plan!

    "We will either have to live and party like there is no tomorrow or, we will have to work very, very hard collectively to keep from going off the climate cliff into irreversible climate destabilization." --Comment from young person who has studied the challenge.

    Maybe we should do both? What do you think?

    Climate destabilization is worse than what you have just read and its recognition is even now coming from very conservative organizations like the World Bank and the Natural Resource Council. The Natural Resource Council supplies its reports to the American intelligence agencies.

    Click here for the research graphs behind the above data and the Two Climate Destabilization Shockers of Global Warming that You Absolutely Need to Know to Wisely Plan Your Family's Future.

    Click this Join/Subscribe link or the one at the top of the page and we will keep you informed of Universe Spirit events and important updates. Also subscribe to our blog separately by clicking here.

     

    Nike

  • Climate Change And Hurricane Sandy: How Global Warming Might Have Made The Hurricane Sandy Superstorm Worse

    Will this be just the first of global climate destabilization storms to hit the east coast? Will Sandy re-ignite the climate destabilization prevention conversation?

    As officials begin the arduous task of pumping corrosive seawater out of New York City’s subway system and try to restore power to lower Manhattan, and residents of the New Jersey Shore begin to take stock of the destruction, experts and political leaders are asking what Hurricane Sandy had to do with climate change. After all, the storm struck a region that has been hit hard by several rare extreme weather events in recent years, from Hurricane Irene to “Snowtober.”

    Scientists cannot yet answer the specific question of whether climate change made Hurricane Sandy more likely to occur, since such studies, known as detection and attribution research, take many months to complete. What is already clear, however, is that climate change very likely made Sandy’s impacts worse than they otherwise would have been.

    There are three different ways climate change might have influenced Sandy: through the effects of sea level rise; through abnormally warm sea surface temperatures; and possibly through an unusual weather pattern that some scientists think bore the fingerprint of rapidly disappearing Arctic sea ice.

    If this were a criminal case, detectives would be treating global warming as a likely accomplice in the crime.

    To read more of this story by Andrew Freeman, click here.

     

    Click this Join/Subscribe link or the one at the top of the page and we will keep you informed of Universe Spirit events and important updates. Also subscribe to this Universe blog separately by clicking here.
     
    If you would like to see a realistic comprehensive and systemic approach to global warming and climate destabilization, click here.

    Air Jordan XIV High

  • More about Us and the New Evolution Spirituality for Repeat Visitors and Members (I)(A)

    Notice: The Evolution Spirituality found on this website is also an open source, personalized and self-created spiritual process. You can always self-select, modify, sequence and use or not use the wisdom and tools you find on this website in the ways that will work best for your current conditions, stage of spiritual development and understanding.

    We have no rigid spiritual dogma that you must believe. We do although have lots of science and principles for which you are the final authority who decides their truth and usefulness. Encouraging spiritual personalization, experimentation and deciding what is true for you is just one of the many qualities of Evolution Spirituality. Please feel free to take, use, adapt any of the ideas of this new spirituality or the evolutionary science that you find to improve your lifestyle, livelihood, personal spirituality and your local spiritual community.

    You can pick the question that interests you most or you can use the questions in the sequence given below as a kind of check sheet to expand your overview of what we are and do:

     

    Click this Join/Subscribe link or the one at the top of the page and we will keep you informed of Universe Spirit events and important updates. Also subscribe to this Universe blog separately by clicking here.

    If you would like to see a realistic comprehensive and systemic approach to global warming and climate destabilization, click here.

     

    nike free run 5.0 style

  • One No-Cost, Easy Action that Everyone Can Do to Help Reverse Catastrophic Climate Destabilization
    Change the Climate Conversation Framing!
     
    Stop using the terms global warming and climate change in your climate discussions. Please use climate cliff, climate destabilization or catastrophic, irreversible or extinction level climate destabilization because --- that's exactly what is really happening or could soon happen!
     
    Use these terms where applicable in every conversation to replace the terms global warming and climate change. Use these new terms and watch how the conversation evolves to a richer more informative and lively process.
     
     
    Please encourage your friends and other non-profit organizations to do the same. This truly is something easy and simple to do and that everyone can afford to do immediately.
     
    Re-framing the climate conversation is critical because as unbelievable as it seems, no one can say with any accuracy "at what point do we finally across the last tipping point into irreversible catastrophic climate destabilization" or, even if, we have already crossed that final irreversible climate destabilization tipping point. That is really scary because nothing less than humanity's whole future is at risk.
     
    Human-caused carbon pollution of the atmosphere with its still unknown irreversible climate destabilization tipping points is the single most dangerous and potentially destructive "blind experiment" in all of human history. Please be a part of the effective solution. Start by using only climate destabilization and catastrophic or irreversible climate destabilization when ever you are in a global warming or climate change conversation. They are far more accurate and appropriate in describing the growing catastrophic climate destabilization challenge we all are facing.
     

     

    Click this Join/Subscribe link or the one at the top of the page and we will keep you informed of Universe Spirit events and important updates. Also subscribe to this Universe blog separately by clicking here.

    If you would like to see a realistic comprehensive and systemic approach to global warming and climate destabilization, click here.

     

    Crazy Explosive Boost 2017 PK Low

  • Essential Climate Info 5: The World's Most Valuable Financial and Security Information

    The World's New Most Valuable Information!

    Are our families, businesses, and nations prepared to adapt to increasing climate destabilization already manifesting in weather extremes, growing economic losses, international security issues, and increasing food and resource shortages? Global warming-caused climate destabilization promises far more that just increased resource wars, political instability, and hundreds of trillions of dollars in climate related financial losses.

    If we ignore the current climate tipping point science, are we prepared for the increasingly severe consequences as we march toward catastrophic and finally irreversible or extinction level climate destabilization? (Extinction level here is defined as the projected potential extinction of approximately half or more of the species on earth and most [60-90%] if not all, of humanity. Irreversible whenever used is defined as severe climate destabilization consequences that could take hundreds or even thousands of years to correct or re-balance or never correct or re-balance.)

    One can hardly turn on the news and not hear about another catastrophic heat wave, drought, wildfire, extreme storm, or flood breaking previous all previous records. Hurricane Sandy on the east coast was just one of those 100 billion dollar disasters.

    According to a leading global climate scientist on global warming these are NOT just naturally caused or random weather anomalies! They are real signs that human-caused carbon pollution is a driving force in the warming (from more heat energy in the atmosphere).  Climate destabilization is already here! (A link to extreme weather global warming research is at the end of this copy.)

    Some Consequences of Global Warming Induced Climate Destabilization:

    The current climate destabilization problem is rather simple at its core, but more complex upon further examination. Human-caused carbon pollution of the atmosphere is causing a greenhouse effect, trapping more solar energy in the form of heat inside our atmospheric greenhouse. This additional trapped increase in atmospheric heat energy is then available for use in and by the planet's weather (monsoons, hurricanes, typhoons, [and their storm surges]) heat waves, droughts, dust storms, wildfires, floods, etc).

    That extra available energy then amplifies existing weather patterns. This continually increasing trapped heat energy from the i greenhouse effect will continue to create a positive feedback loop of greater climate destabilization and more and greater weather extremes. And -- this climate destabilization will increase in both unpredictable and irregular cycles of weather extremes of increasing scale, frequency, and severity if left unchecked, leading to irreversible catastrophic climate destabilization.

    These weather extremes mean many new and extreme adaptive challenges for the world. Our current infrastructure (dikes, dams, levees, water and sewage treatment plants, and much of our other infrastructure) has most often been designed to withstand the extreme climate events that occur about once every hundred years ( aka storms of the century). The increasing extreme weather and storms caused by our ever-increasing human-caused atmospheric carbon pollution and its additional trapped energy will eventually become known as millennial storms --- climate events of such an extreme and severity that there has been nothing like them seen on the planet for thousand of years.

    That is the simplicity of what are some of the consequences of climate destabilization, but there are other critical and complex contributing sub-factors such as the key climate tipping points.

    The following video Wake Up, Freak Out - Then Get a Grip is 11 minutes long. If you have not viewed it already, it gives a basic yet detailed animated explanation of the key climate tipping points and how they work, changing states of historic climate stability, what is actually happening now to destabilize the global climate. This video has been viewed over a million times and has been translated into 22 different languages.

    (Please note: The above animation gives temperature degrees in Celsius. For a quick rough Fahrenheit temperature conversion, double the Celsius amount. The video also presents near the end a polarized viewpoint of us against them [that is, us against the vested fossil fuel interests, corporations, and heavily lobbied governments.] It is still a well done animation that does an amazing job of explaining the basics of how and why catastrophic climate destabilization is unfolding. Our organization does not promote polarizing or dualistic approaches. We try to see things from the big-picture viewpoint of progressive universe evolution in which everyone and everything is learning from feedback and then either adapting and growing or if they down learn from feedback being broken down and being recycled.)

    The Global Climate and Its Mysterious Tipping Points:

    Climate systems are complex adaptive systems and most complex adaptive systems have tipping points. Those tipping points can cause sudden, unpredictable and severe changes or collapses.

    Small changes in one sub-system can cause massive unpredictable changes in the master system or other related sub-systems. In complex adaptive systems, tipping points in the master climate system or in its subsystems can unpredictably whipsaw into each other or back into the master climate system, worsening it even faster.  

    (If you do not understand the basics of complex adaptive systems and their high levels of unpredictability we strongly recommend that you click this complex adaptive systems link because understanding the climate as a complex adaptive system and its tipping point paradoxes will be greatly aided and simplified...)

    In the face of more good climate destabilization science, even some leading global warming critics are also changing their long time positions. Additionally, the terms global warming and climate change have recently evolved into the new terms of climate destabilization or catastrophic climate destabilization. These new terms better reflect the existing and accurate reality of the human caused atmospheric pollution problem immediately before us.

    Because overall research on climate destabilization is still so poorly funded, the world still does not know most of the actual tipping points of climate destabilization. When it comes to the climate destabilization tipping points we are still flying nearly blind -- even with the ultimate future of humanity's total evolutionary experiment at stake.

    Current climate destabilization research cited in Six Degrees: Our Future On a Hotter Planet by Mark Lynas has projected that climate destabilization related damage and losses will soon cost nations 5% of their total Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and will likely continue rising far beyond there with each new level of climate destabilization's unfolding. This comes as devastatingly bad news for the economic markets because this additional 5% drain on the GDP can hardly be afforded by almost all nations still struggling to get out of the slowly resolving global recession and near depression.

    Many countries are already experiencing resource shortage based spikes in food costs. The normally insulated US will likely follow at some point because of the year-to-year averaging of the resilience-reducing effects of escalating climate destabilization.

    In spite of all the new science on climate destabilization and its projected effects, few individuals, corporations or nations have worked out even the most basic preparation and adaptation plans to cope with the increasing scale, severity and frequency of the effects of catastrophic climate destabilization.

    The Key Climate Destabilization Tipping Points Are:

    (If you have not done so already, we strongly recommend that you view a very well done 10 minute video animation that graphically explains many of the different climate tipping points as well as the overall climate tipping point crisis. To view this video illustration of climate tipping point issues, click here. This video will help make the following tipping point descriptions easier and more useful...)

    How can we resolve any problem without accurate information? The most scary thing about climate destabilization is that the research is far too sparse right now on the accurate tipping points catastrophic of climate destabilization. It is so sparse that no one can yet conclusively tell us:

    a.) is the global average temperature going to go up an additional maximum of  2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 degrees Celsius? That is 4-16 degrees Fahrenheit. And, no one can tell us exactly which of those temperatures will we be at in the next 5, 10, 15, 25, 50 or 100 years.

    b.) Is sea level going to go up less than one meter, 1-3 meters, 8 meters (if all Greenland ice melts,) or up to 25 meters (if all the other polar and glacial ice melts too). Again, no one can tell us exactly which of those sea level ranges will we be at in 5, 10, 15, 25, 50 or 100 years. (The current conservative estimate for sea level rise in the next 100 years is 1-2 meters of sea level rise, but that is if no tipping points are crossed!)

    This estimate of 1-2 meters in sea level rise simply does not factor in any major climate tipping points being crossed during the projected time period, which could throw the climate into a sudden and steep decline toward greater destabilization. This sea level rise also does not include any of the additional temporary rises in sea level at this new level caused by storm surges.

    Even if you do not include these two factors, just the 1-2 meter rise in sea level would cost the global human society hundreds of trillions of dollars in losses in coastal real estate and coastal infrastructure. (Highways, water treatment and wastewater systems, etc. close to the water would all have to be rebuilt and relocated.)

    To put this in perspective, in 2008 the Wall Street market crash cost an estimated 28 trillion dollars and brought the world to the edge of global depression. At 8 meters of sea level rise (the melting of the the Greenland ice sheet,) an estimated half of the world's population would have to migrate. This would result in hundreds of trillions of dollars in real estate and infrastructure losses.

    c.) What level of carbon and methane pollution (measured in parts per million [ppm],) produces each specific level of temperature increase or sea level rise? When exactly will we reach the various levels of projected human-caused atmospheric carbon pollution levels measured in parts per million;  i.e. carbon 450, carbon 550, carbon 650, carbon 850, etc?

    We are currently at about 400 carbon ppm. (Carbon 430 if you include methane in the atmosphere.) Some our best scientists warn that anything over carbon 350 is courting climate catastrophe and that carbon 450 is near certain and potentially irreversible climate destabilization. We are currently adding approximately 2 ppm of carbon to the atmosphere per year, but that current annual 2 carbon ppm amount except for 2014, appears to be rising in a nonlinear,  exponential growth curve as well.

    d.) Will the many wildcard climate feedback loop variables amplifying the speed of temperature rise and sea level rise occur faster and more unpredictably than anyone could have imagined or, worse yet, have we already crossed these tipping points? Will these wildcard feedback loop variables whipsaw back on each other and between each other in unpredictable ways that are absolutely normal to complex adaptive systems like the climate?

    These feedback loops and climate tipping point wildcards would be things like:

    1.) massive loss of the atmospheric carbon-eating forests because of heat, drought, and wildfires,

    2.) massive releases of methane from the warming and decaying of the permafrost near the polar areas (methane produces 20 times the greenhouse heat-holding effect that carbon does for three years in the atmosphere before it decays back into simple carbon again),

    3.) massive die offs of the carbon-eating sea plankton because of the growing carbonization and acidification of the oceans,

    4.) massive loss of white polar and glacial ice that reflects much earth-heating solar heat back into space in what is called the Albedo effect and, the greatest threat of all ---

    5.) what level of rising ocean temperature will thaw and release the gigatons of frozen methane hydrate crystals trapped along the continental shelves of our oceans and in the permafrost of the frozen tundra around the world.

    A sudden mega release of carbon into the atmosphere from methane hydrate crystals has been predicted to be to what could become the last great planetary extinction event that will leave either no one left or as few as 200 million of us left living close to the poles. Scientists have theorized this massive methane release occurred once before millions of years ago and was the most probable cause of one of the 5 previous great mass extinction events of our planetary history. It was called the PETM extinction event. Also see Six Degrees: Our Future On a Hotter Planet by Mark Lynas for more information on this. The 200 million survivor scenario is from The Vanishing Face of Gaia by James Lovelock.

    Inside the methane release wildcard, whether it's from the frozen tundra or from the ocean's coastal shelves is a another even more dangerous wildcard.

    6.) the climate destabilization caused pandemic wildcard. When ice or frozen tundra that is hundreds of thousands of years old melts, the melting releases bacteria and viruses that are still alive that have never been seen by the human body or human species in its total history. This means we could be unleashing the ultimate pandemic upon humanity. With the rapid melting of global ice, glaciers, and tundra we could be releasing so many different types of bacteria and viruses that even our best scientists could not keep up with creating the new vaccines in sufficient global quantities in time to contain the new disease outbreaks and pandemics…

    7.) there is also the whipsaw multiplier effect. The whipsaw multiplier effect occurs when the tipping points of one system crash into another inter-connected system. Of everything mentioned so far, this may be the most dangerous--and unfortunately the least currently predictable--of all tipping points and wildcards. This is due to the woeful inadequacy of current tipping point research funding.

    Tipping points even in seemingly unrelated systems can mean a lot for getting the climate re-stabilized. For example, the seemingly unrelated tipping points of peak oil being fully known could make a tremendous difference and boost political will to resolve climate destabilization and move to low carbon and methane pollution green energy generation. If we are already out of enough easy to reach, cost effective and environmentally safe to extract "cleaner" fossil fuels, knowing that fact will be a tremendous additional incentive to move rapidly to green energy generation. (Yes, there still are very some very hard to reach, cost ineffective [unless we go to $150 per barrel or more prices,] environmentally unsafe to extract, dirty to burn fossil fuels such as oil from tar sands. Extracting those remaining fossil fuels should be seen as the beginning of the end of hope in the climate battle.)

    Because fossil fuels provide so many other product like fertilizers, drugs, and other critical plastics, knowing the peak oil tipping points as they relate to the destabilizing climate and new forms of green energy generation is a must! What if we discover there is only enough easy to reach, cost effective, and environmentally safe to extract "cleaner" fossil fuels for just our fertilizers, critical plastics, and some reduced transportation for the next 25-35 years? We urgently need to know what is the  prediction for the minimal years needed to make the transition to green energy generation to power our transportation needs without putting the climate into irreversible destabilization or an extinction level event.

    e.) What is the momentum and/or inertia tipping points of heat capture in the oceans caused by the increasing temperature in the atmosphere? Oceans take up and release atmospheric heat slowly, and there is a lag time because of this inertia/momentum issue. This means that any changes we make now to reduce atmospheric carbon pollution may not have any significant effect for 50 years or more because of inertia/momentum of previously captured heat by the oceans.

    This additional set of ocean temperature inertia/momentum tipping points must also be factored into all the climate model calculations with all of the other still unknown climate tipping points. The population of earth needs to prepared. If we immediately stopped all human caused carbon pollution today, the temperature of the planet still may continue going up to critical levels for another 50-100 years or more--just due to ocean heating inertia/momentum and tipping points.

    Aside from the tipping points of carbonization, plankton, and heat absorption, there is the potential effect of carbon pollution and warming on major ocean currents that help to stabilize our weather and seasons. Research is now being conducted on this and how it might affect things like the critical North Atlantic current. If the North Atlantic current were slowed or diverted, it would create significant changes in weather patterns, which would affect growing seasons, rain, snowfall, and temperature--all of which have strong effects on crop yields.

    Another tipping point relating to the oceans is whether the heat now being captured by the oceans and sent to lower levels of the ocean will reach a tipping point in the near future. These masses of deep warm water could suddenly rise to the surface again and radically change global weather even faster.

    f.) There are other key tipping points in the complex adaptive global climate system such as the total amount of water vapor in the atmosphere. That increases with more heat, which then creates more water vapor and then more heat in an endless heat increasing positive feedback cycle. The quantity and quality of trees in the planetary environment that can remove or add carbon to the atmosphere. These and many other climate tipping points must be discovered so we have both the right risk analysis and can create the right first things first plan for the challenge.

    g.) There are also new potential critical climate tipping points being discovered such as the total weight of the melting ice tipping point. New research predicts that as the ice melts off areas where the ice is sitting on land masses that that the unweighting of these land masses can cause shifts in the tectonic plates of the planet--causing earthquakes and volcanic eruptions at a scale that we have not seen on the planet for ages. If the shifting of these tectonic plates causes numerous or massive volcanic eruptions around the planet,we could go into a sudden volcanic winter. If the shifting tectonic plates trigger a supervolcanic eruption, the years that the sun would be blocked could kill off most of the human population.

    h.) There are also human system tipping points. Political and social inertia also has to be factored into realistic solution calculations. It takes about 25-50 years to evolve a whole industry from one product, manufacturing, and distribution system to another. It has been estimated that if every nation on the planet immediately enforced heavy penalties on all forms of carbon pollution and stopped constructing coal energy generation plants, in 25-50 years we would have only about a 50-80 drop in current human caused carbon pollution levels. That has not happened yet. Based on current attitudes and politics it has almost no chance of happening.

    Estimating political, economic, and social take-action tipping points will also be critical to all climate destabilization supercomputer models if we are ever going to enact a calculated solution to this shared global threat. Who knows when  there will be verifiable and enforceable international environmental law on carbon pollution and the key human system action tipping point will be reached.

    Now consider this scary thought: most of the above climate wildcards and inaccurately predicted tipping points are NOT currently built into and used by current professional climate prediction models. The research on when these tipping points and wildcards will occur is just not there yet. Even the IPCC's 2014 four scenarios on what level of carbon ppm in the atmosphere will produce exactly what degree of temperature increase or sea level rise do not include the above relevant climate tipping point information. Nor do they tell us with any real or dependable specificity when various temperatures and rising sea level predictions will be met under current conditions.

    Also keep in mind that in IPPC reports the IPPC predicted that Arctic summer sea ice would remain to some degree until about 2050. New research shows the tipping point for Arctic summer ice being gone will occur in 2017-2025. This means that in 2007 they were 38 - 25 years off on a key prediction just 43 years into the future. That is a key climate prediction that is approximately 60-80 percent wrong!

    If the IPPC was that far off with just one tipping point linked item, how far off and overly enthusiastic or conservative are they with their other prediction calculations? The unspoken fear is  that catastrophic climate destabilization is proceeding much faster toward irreversible climate destabilization than any of our predictions because of all the missing tipping point data and missing wildcard factors in our current climate prediction models.

    If that was not bad enough, there are also many ways these tipping points and wildcards can whipsaw against each other and the overall climate and become multiplying or reinforcing positive feedback loops that would make sea levels rise and the temperature rise far faster and sooner than anyone has predicted. What if the rise in temperature causes the melting permafrost to cross its tipping point where, instead of releasing methane in a linear progression, it tips over into an exponential progression, releasing far more methane into the atmosphere. (To make matters even worse methane has 20 times the heat-holding greenhouse effect of simple carbon.)

    This surge in atmospheric greenhouse heat energy retention from the exponential tipping point release of methane then also causes the global temperature to surge exponentially. This triggers the ice melting tipping points where the already vulnerable West Antarctica ice shelf breaks off, destabilizing much of the the surrounding ice causing it too to break off the ice shelf and begin melting in the sea. Because the West Antarctic ice shelves have broken off, it then accelerates the slide the West Antarctica inner ice towards release into the ocean as well. Sea levels will rises dramatically beyond all predictions with so much ice sliding into the ocean.

    The temperature surge causes massive melting in Greenland and other areas causing another tipping point to be reached. This massive loss of sun reflecting ice called the Albedo effect causes another surge in global temperature. The previous crossed climate system tipping points will add so much additional heat energy to the atmosphere that new more frequent and intense droughts and wildfires would kill off atmospheric carbon eating trees. This then crosses another tipping point because far less carbon is being naturally absorbed by trees.

    This then causes another spike and surge in global temperature which causes the other tipping points to further whipsaw into each other and deteriorate even faster. This then causes a massive die off of sea plankton (that also "eat" and absorb carbon) due to the acidification of the oceans.

    The whipsawing and self reinforcing positive feedback loops of all the above tipping points and wildcards collectively cause another climate tipping point to be crossed as the ocean begins to warm exponentially as well. (The oceans are the main place that atmospheric heat is eventually captured. When heat is captured in the oceans, the heat causes the seas to expand also contributing to sea level rise.) The oceans keep heating up until the major catastrophic tipping point is crossed where frozen methane hydrate crystals begin to thaw in mass and suddenly release gigatons of additional methane into the atmosphere, spiking both temperature and sea levels once again to near extinction level events.

    Still missing from the above climate tipping point issue is that no one can currently say with any accuracy at what point do we finally cross from near extinction climate destabilization to extinction level climate destabilization. No one can tell us what single or collection of tipping point actions will do it or, if we have already crossed that final irreversible tipping point. This is again because the science is so incomplete and underfunded. This ultimately makes our growing human-caused carbon and methane pollution of the atmosphere the single most dangerous and potentially destructive blind experiment in all of human history.

    Increasing human-caused carbon pollution in the atmosphere has the potential to cause more human suffering and death as well as political, social and economic destabilization than the total sum of all wars in all of human history. In spite of this shocking and real climate-caused possibility, as of yet, it is believed that no national intelligence agency in any country (even some with their supercomputers and unlimited budgets,) has either discovered or published accurate tipping point research or answers to any of the climate tipping point questions and wildcard issues mentioned above.

    This in and of itself should be viewed by every citizen as the greatest single national security failure by the world's intelligence agencies. In not briefing the politicians and the general public on the full risk analysis and tipping points of climate destabilization tipping points they are failing in their most basic of duties ---- to protect their own populations and respective national security interests from real threats. These escalating and potentially game-ending threats to our nations, our civilization and human life as we know it lie absolutely at fair core responsibilities to their nations.

    Some experts fear that when more science is available on these climate tipping points we may be too late. We will suddenly discover ourselves to be either already beyond or soon beyond the critical climate tipping points.

    If we have already passed any major climate tipping point unknowingly, we may be experiencing significantly worse climate extremes in as little as 5-15 years. Others researchers suggest we have 20-30 years while other researchers say it will take 30-60 years.

    Good climate destabilization tipping point research is simply just not available or robust enough yet. If it was, it would allow us to do a much more accurate risk analysis and decide which researchers are more right or more wrong. Without this critical climate tipping point research being completed, it is also impossible to propose and implement a properly sequenced, optimally effective and rational plan that is properly prioritized and know it will work in time to prevent the worst of the consequences of irreversible or near extinction climate destabilization.

    "Under any condition, circumstance or excuse, not resolving global warming in time to avert the increasing probability of irreversible climate destabilization (and its dangerous average global temperature increase,) is simply a "bet" that no individual, corporation, nation or humanity can EVER afford to place! This is because gambling with the known and unknown tipping points of irreversible climate destabilization and losing this gambling bet comes with such a "gambling debt" no individual, corporation, or nation (or even all nations together,) will EVER be able to pay off or recover from even a fraction of it during their life cycles.

    This global climate truth means we have to stop gambling with the future of humanity now and remove the escalating climate destabilization bet that we have currently and unknowingly placed on the table. Not making radical and immediate change to remove our bad climate bet is like a government leaving nuclear reactors unattended and nuclear weapons unguarded.

    No government official in their right mind would do this, but that is exactly what we are doing with our escalating climate destabilization "nuclear time bomb" when we continue to gamble foolishly betting that we will be safe from the known and unknown tipping points of irreversible climate destabilization.

    We must now begin preparing and adapting for the worsening climate destabilization. We must also do our utmost to lessen global warming just enough to prevent it from ever becoming an irreversible climate destabilization that could last for either hundreds or thousands of years. If irreversible climate destabilization does occur, it will create unimaginable suffering beyond any scale, scope, or severity that we have ever seen before in human history and it will continue for generations to come." --Lawrence Wollersheim

    When you look at all of the climate tipping points and wildcards listed above, you then clearly see the climate destabilization risk that simply cannot ever be taken! No nation, leader or corporation ever  has the right to to act for all humanity and its future and place the bet that we will not cross these critical climate tipping points and go over the climate cliff.

    Also, if any of the above tipping points do occur, no one has the right to  promise" some new technology will soon be found "just in time" to save us from extinction as a species. This is another foolish climate bet that encourages us to go on as we are now. This dangerous promise should never be placed or relied upon anywhere, at any time by any person or group.

    Don't rely on last minute undiscovered new technologies to save us from climate destabilization. The responsibility is ours. It is now up to us to worked diligently and with urgency to reverse climate destabilization with a full commitment from every level of government, business and every individual citizen because of the unknown climate tipping points and wild cards mentioned above...

    To continue reading in this Job One for Humanity booklet, click the links to the right or left below. Click the UP link to see all of the linked pages in this booklet at the bottom of that page.
     

    Air Max 95 Stussy

  • Why We Must Replace the term “Global Warming” with “Climate Destabilization” in Climate Debates and the Media

    Farmers in Africa’s Sahel region have planted trees on 5 million hectares of degraded land, since 1975

    "How we frame the climate conversation matters --- it matters a lot."    Andrew Guzman on NPR Radio

    More non-profit environmental groups, responsible media, NGOs, enlightened corporations and governments are beginning to abandon the terms climate change and global warming for the new terms or phrases "global warming and its consequent climate destabilization," climate destabilization, catastrophic climate destabilization, irreversible climate destabilization and extinction level climate destabilization. (If you have not yet read the full and concise definition of what climate destabilization is, click here.)

    If we are ever going to create the necessary awareness within the public to lessen and slowdown global warming and hope to eventually ever resolve it, it is imperative that we stop using the term global warming by itself and we stop using the term climate change. The terms global warming by itself and climate change are often confusing to the general public.  They are also simply not accurate enough in describing the real climate emergency that humanity now faces. 

    The term global warming used by itself is problematic for several reasons. First of all, it leads people to believe that the whole world will be getting warmer. Yet as the average temperature of the planet increases, certain places will actually become colder. 

    With global warming we'll also be dealing with more frequent and more severe storms, which will take new pathways never seen before. Flooding will increase in certain places while desertification will be the issue in others.

    Global warming used alone hides the truth that the end result of global warming is global climate destabilization and this climate destabilization then creates a whole chain off much worse global and national consequences than just “it's getting a little warmer and I will have to use my air-conditioner more.”

    Climate change as it term is so vague it is all but useless to reflect what's really going on. It also should not be used in part, because we live our lives with ever changing weather. Changing weather is so normal we give it little attention or concern unless we are warned it's going to be severe and it will affect our specific plans.

    Climate change is also a term used most often by fossil fuel industry paid lobbyists, think tanks and media to control the climate discussion’s framing and confuse us about what is really happening to our global climate. The global climate isn't just changing--it is destabilizing and its searching for a new equilibrium level that will most likely be very unfriendly to our well-being.  Because of the before mentioned, climate change should never be used by informed individuals who understand the climate destabilization issues.

    Thus the phrases, “global warming and its consequent climate destabilization” or “climate destabilization” by itself are the first terms to use. We also suggest you use the terms catastrophic climate destabilization, irreversible climate destabilization and extinction-level climate destabilization as the conversation gets going! All of the preceding terms more accurately reflect what is already happening with our current climate and it is what will continue to happen in the near future with increasing severity, scale, and frequency.

    Please use the above new climate terms in every climate conversation you have and watch how the conversation evolves to a richer, more informative, and transformative process when you do. Keep in mind that accurate climate destabilization fear is not a bad thing. It is an critical evolutionary mechanism used to mobilize the resources of the body and mind to better resolve a real threat relating to accurate fears.

    Additionally and worth repeating:

    1.) It has now become public knowledge that lobbyists, think tanks and PR firms on the payroll of the fossil fuel industry have been working behind the scenes to very intentionally, and with great concerted effort, use their power to replace the term global warming with the far more nebulous, benign and confusing term climate change. They are doing this at every level in the local, regional, national and even international discussions of the climate crisis; you will find both the media and government using climate change where they used to use global warming. Even large environmental organizations have unconsciously been duped by the clever fossil fuel PR firms and lobbyists and have started using the confusing and crisis-diminishing language embodied in the term climate change.

    2.) The clever fossil fuel PR firms knew that redefining global warming into climate change was brilliant. It completely reframed the way you  interpret what you are hearing. Again, ecause the climate is always changing in our daily experience of our weather, there is no big deal or implied importance within such an innocent term as climate change! This makes the climate change term meaninglessly and benign, and it certainly would not alarm anyone or call him or her to action, even when action and alarm is appropriate.

    The Terms Global Warming and Climate Change Does Not Reflect the Seriousness of the Challenge We Face in Our Future:

    The terms global warming and climate change has been confusing to the general public's personal experience of the ever-changing global weather. Global warming or climate change is also not accurate enough to describe the current climate conditions that humanity now faces since the idea of global warming was first introduced to the public in the 1970's.

    We will soon be dealing with rising sea levels (possibly up to 2 to as many as 8 meters before the end of the century), causing storm surges like the planet has not seen in tens of thousands of years.

    Global warming and its consequent climate destabilization, climate destabilization, catastrophic climate destabilization, irreversible and extinction level climate destabilization are also the new terms of art, because they are far more accurate and useful in reflecting what is already happening or what will continue to happen with increasing severity, scale and frequency --- unless we take effective planet-wide action immediately! (Extinction level here is defined as the projected potential extinction of approximately half or more of the species on earth and most (60-90% if not all, of humanity. Irreversible, whenever used, is defined as severe climate destabilization consequences that could take hundreds or even thousands of years to correct or rebalance or may never be corrected or rebalanced.)

    Destabilization is a more accurate term, because the global climate is being destabilized from a relatively stable post ice age state toward a much hotter state resembling an  earlier time in the planet's fiery evolution. Destabilization reflects what will happen to our economic, political and social systems as increasing human-caused carbon pollution accelerates climate destabilization.

    If we do not take action and solve this challenge, catastrophic, irreversible and extinction level climate destabilization is the perfect way to describe what will probably lead to the eventual catastrophic reduction or extinction of the human population from almost 8 billion to several hundred million people forced to live near the poles.

    Using the terms global warming with its consequent climate destabilization, climate destabilization, or catastrophic, irreversible and extinction level climate destabilization conveys the true urgency of the situation. They reframe and redefine the climate discussion toward the real problems and rapidly escalating catastrophic consequences of the issue rather than toward vague or misleading descriptions that promote ambiguity..

    If you’re a farmer, and you lose your annual crop to a climate destabilization-caused drought, that's a catastrophe with urgency! If you’re a home owner, and you lose your home to climate destabilization-caused floods or wildfires, that's a catastrophe with real urgency! If you’re a consumer, and your food prices keep going up because of climate destabilization-caused droughts and shortages, and you cannot afford enough food to eat, that's an urgent, serious potential extinction problem and, at the least, a catastrophe in the making for billions of people -- just like you and me.

    If climate destabilization goes out of control to its potential projected maximums and 7.8 billion people die, that is the ultimate catastrophe. It will be the extinction or near extinction of the human species, and many other species will go with us. This growing loss of species is already being called the sixth great mass extinction event.

    Bringing up the subject of the climate cliff and catastrophic or irreversible climate destabilization with others also engenders a whole new level of reaction and engagement. It sounds bad -- is bad -- and can convincingly be argued that it is the most important single issue related to our species' survival and our descending environmental quality of life in the 21st century.

    Simply put, resolving the climate cliff and climate destabilization has become the single most important task in all of human history. Continuing to use older, confusing and vague terms such as global warming and climate change hides the real consequences and the criticalness of the problem to all of humanity.

    "The greatest fear for the future of humanity is the still unknown critical tipping points involved in today's accelerating catastrophic climate destabilization. Without discovering these quickly, we could find ourselves facing complete extinction as a species without even knowing that we had passed the climate tipping points of no return (or reasonable recovery,) until it was too late to do anything about it. No other fear or human problem today matches the destructive scope, probability and immediacy of this climate destabilization challenge.

    Catastrophic, Irreversible and Extinction Level Climate Destabilization should be thought of in the same scope of potential global destructiveness as a massive asteroid on a direct, certain and imminent collision course with earth. You certainly would not sit idle in that situation without demanding more and better information from your leaders on arrival dates, consequences and necessary preparations. Why aren't we collectively doing this now for catastrophic climate destabilization?"    Lawrence Wollersheim

    Please stop using the confusing, misleading and non-specific terms global warming and climate change, and start using global warming with its consequent climate destabilization, climate destabilization or catastrophic, irreversible and extinction level climate destabilization, and watch what happens. From an evolutionary perspective, we have not evolved to adapt effectively to non-specific and vague threats to our survival. We need to communicate a real and specific danger to mobilize our common adaptation abilities and resolve the climate cliff and climate destabilization challenges.

    The older non-specific, confusing and misleading global warming and climate change conversation has been going on for over 30 years with little success. Please encourage individuals and organizations to help change the climate conversation by using more specific, accurate and useful terms climate cliff, climate destabilization, catastrophic climate destabilization, and irreversible and extinction level climate destabilization.

    This is something simple and easy that everyone of us can do. This long overdue, appropriate and more accurate re-framing of this issue alone will do a tremendous amount to move us closer to its resolution. Or as the Buddhists might say "right speech (words,) leads to right action."

    If you know of any environmental organizations, media or government branches still using the fossil fuel industry’s misleading and misdirecting term climate change, please forward this information to them as soon as possible. Please ask them to stop using climate change and start using climate destabilization, and keep asking them until they do. Let's get the attention of the Public Will focused on a real, serious and now unfolding challenge to our global, national, regional and local well-being.

    To learn what global warming-caused climate destabilization is, click here.

    To learn what you can do to reverse global warming and climate destabilization, click here.

    Please note, the term climate destabilization appears to have been first used by Greg Craven in his book, What's the Worst that Could Happen? A rational response to the climate change debate.

    Click this Join/Subscribe link or the one at the top of the page and we will keep you informed of Universe Spirit events and important updates. Also subscribe to our blog separately by clicking here.

    Latest adidas Ultra Boost Trainer Releases

  • Effective Steps to Prevent Catastrophic Climate Destabilization

    The following is a prioritized list of the key things that can be done by anyone who understands that we cannot delay action on this issue any longer. The first two items on this list are ranked in order of highest priority, effectiveness and need.

    It is urgent that we act now. Averting the looming global climate catastrophe will take the most massive and immediate human effort ever coordinated in human history. For all of the effective actions you can do to prevent irreversible catastrophic climate destabilization, click here.

     

    Click this Join/Subscribe link or the one at the top of the page and we will keep you informed of Universe Spirit events and important updates. Also subscribe to this Universe blog separately by clicking here.

    If you would like to see a realistic comprehensive and systemic approach to global warming and climate destabilization, click here.

    Girls Shoes

Pages